camwyn: (Vault Boy)
[personal profile] camwyn
Oh, now I remember what I was going to put in my prior post. A question about the Fallout universe. Namely:

Was part of the Fallout universe's divergence from the real one the non-ratification or the eventual loss of the Geneva Conventions?

I ask mostly because of the bit in the opening cinematic of the first Fallout game where the very first thing we see that isn't cartoon footage is a newsreel clip of "our brave boys keeping the peace in recently annexed Canada". Two figures in power armor and full-face helmets have a man in basic body armor kneeling in the street in front of them. One of them pulls out a pistol and shoots the kneeling man in the head. Then he and his companion turn and wave to the camera.

It's that blithe, cheerful wave that has me wondering. That is not the same as the execution of the Cambodian general that was captured on film- and I understand that particular shot was a desperate measure with considerably more story behind it than most Americans ever know or see. The image in the Fallout opening vid is the act of a man happily waving to a news camera when he's just done something our world would never condone. If he were waving to a companion of his taking a picture it might be another thing, because God knows soldiers do that whether they should or not, but that was news footage. That's the mark of a world where either overwhelming public opinion is behind you... or there is absolutely nothing to punish you for what you just did.

So did Geneva ever get ratified in the Fallout universe, or did the Conventions get junked altogether, or what?

Date: 2010-11-01 01:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] duane-kc.livejournal.com
The UN disbanded in June, 2052. Canada was annexed in 2076. I think it's possible, even likely, that the Geneva Conventions were repudiated by the US somewhere in that time period. The Third Geneva Convention, covering the treatment of prisoners of war, was ratified in 1929; I rather doubt that the divergence goes back that far, but I suppose it's possible.

Date: 2010-11-01 02:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] antepathy.livejournal.com
The scene you describe reminds me vividly of an old film reel (honestly, I'm not THIS old!) that shows a pair of Einsatzgruppen after shooting a peasant woman in, I think, Poland. They seem downright pleased with themselves, and served a country that allegedly signed and honored the GC.

Remember, though, 3GC really only covers treatment of 'Prisoners of War'. As we've learned from fairly recent events, categorizing someone as something *other* than a POW means they are not covered under GC rules.

Date: 2010-11-02 02:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] caira.livejournal.com
I'd add that the Geneva Convention had its own predecessors—a law historian with too much time on their hands might go back and figure out if the first point of diversion is the 1899 or the 1907 Hague Convention . . .

Profile

camwyn: Me in a bomber jacket and jeans standing next to a green two-man North Andover Flight Academy helicopter. (Default)
camwyn

May 2026

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213 141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 18th, 2026 01:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios