(no subject)
Nov. 1st, 2010 08:03 amOh, now I remember what I was going to put in my prior post. A question about the Fallout universe. Namely:
Was part of the Fallout universe's divergence from the real one the non-ratification or the eventual loss of the Geneva Conventions?
I ask mostly because of the bit in the opening cinematic of the first Fallout game where the very first thing we see that isn't cartoon footage is a newsreel clip of "our brave boys keeping the peace in recently annexed Canada". Two figures in power armor and full-face helmets have a man in basic body armor kneeling in the street in front of them. One of them pulls out a pistol and shoots the kneeling man in the head. Then he and his companion turn and wave to the camera.
It's that blithe, cheerful wave that has me wondering. That is not the same as the execution of the Cambodian general that was captured on film- and I understand that particular shot was a desperate measure with considerably more story behind it than most Americans ever know or see. The image in the Fallout opening vid is the act of a man happily waving to a news camera when he's just done something our world would never condone. If he were waving to a companion of his taking a picture it might be another thing, because God knows soldiers do that whether they should or not, but that was news footage. That's the mark of a world where either overwhelming public opinion is behind you... or there is absolutely nothing to punish you for what you just did.
So did Geneva ever get ratified in the Fallout universe, or did the Conventions get junked altogether, or what?
Was part of the Fallout universe's divergence from the real one the non-ratification or the eventual loss of the Geneva Conventions?
I ask mostly because of the bit in the opening cinematic of the first Fallout game where the very first thing we see that isn't cartoon footage is a newsreel clip of "our brave boys keeping the peace in recently annexed Canada". Two figures in power armor and full-face helmets have a man in basic body armor kneeling in the street in front of them. One of them pulls out a pistol and shoots the kneeling man in the head. Then he and his companion turn and wave to the camera.
It's that blithe, cheerful wave that has me wondering. That is not the same as the execution of the Cambodian general that was captured on film- and I understand that particular shot was a desperate measure with considerably more story behind it than most Americans ever know or see. The image in the Fallout opening vid is the act of a man happily waving to a news camera when he's just done something our world would never condone. If he were waving to a companion of his taking a picture it might be another thing, because God knows soldiers do that whether they should or not, but that was news footage. That's the mark of a world where either overwhelming public opinion is behind you... or there is absolutely nothing to punish you for what you just did.
So did Geneva ever get ratified in the Fallout universe, or did the Conventions get junked altogether, or what?
no subject
Date: 2010-11-01 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-01 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-01 02:02 pm (UTC)Remember, though, 3GC really only covers treatment of 'Prisoners of War'. As we've learned from fairly recent events, categorizing someone as something *other* than a POW means they are not covered under GC rules.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-01 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 02:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 12:20 pm (UTC)I suspect Geneva did exist, though, and got repudiated somewhere along the way. Most medical equipment in the Falloutverse is marked with a five-equal-squares cross. Several medical facilities including medic tents are marked with red five-equal-squares crosses. This implies, if nothing else, that Henri Dunant's influence was felt somewhere along the way. The American Red Cross owes its existence to Clara Barton's experience with the International Committee of the Red Cross, so it's unlikely that the crosses are Clara Barton's influence alone, and the treaties that first established the Red Cross and the basics of treatment of wounded and sick by a neutral agency were rolled out in 1864 and picked up by the States in 1882. #2, for dealing with armed forces wounded/sick at sea, came later. The Geneva provision for prisoners of war wasn't until '29 or '31 now that I'm looking at things... well, anyway, my guess is that if nothing else, the specific cross emblems and the red crosses in particular on hospitals and medic tents indicate at least the First Geneva Convention existed, so it's probably easier to assume at least the first two, maybe the first three, possibly all four were extant at some point in time and then just rejected when the world started descending into bastardry during the Resource Wars.