camwyn: (Megatron demands an explanation)
[personal profile] camwyn
So I understand there's a meme going around involving impressive female characters in our icon collections. Or something like that. I understand it's in response to a rather unpleasant "HA HA ALL FEMALE CHARACTERS ARE ONE OF THESE CATEGORIES HYUK LOOKIT DA WIMMENZ" type of flowchart. More than that I do not know, and am not sure I want to. I figure I'll just stick up my own contribution to the icon side of the deal here:


Mulan- look there was a lot wrong with the Disney movie but SHE'S STILL COOL We all know first-season Janine could have run the place with one arm tied behind her back, right? Ecto-1 as a Transformer. Hell yeah she's female. Kate Shephard, fan character mom to Adrian Shephard of Half-Life: Opposing Force Lone Wanderer/Vault 101 Dweller Ellen Park, of Fallout 3 Also the Vault 101 Dweller! Star Paladin Cross does NOT APPROVE of these shenanigans The voice actor said he played Fawkes as having been female before the FEV. That's good enough for me. I still think Cybertronians have seventeen sexes and humans just translate sixteen as male because we don't have the right words for it ALYX RULES DAMMIT

... okay, that's not many. I mostly play males, or characters without sex or gender. (Granted, humans who interact with these characters tend to assign them gender and they tend to assign them male gender, but still.)

Date: 2010-10-15 12:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gehayi.livejournal.com
Who are they? I recognize Mulan, but no one else.

Re: Pt. 2

Date: 2010-10-15 02:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] prodigal.livejournal.com
Didn't know that about Fawkes. Interesting.

Date: 2010-10-15 09:29 pm (UTC)
ext_14419: the mouse that wants Arthur's brain (Default)
From: [identity profile] derien.livejournal.com
Hm, I'm not sure how that got turned around - I think the person who originally did that flowchart did it with a feminist intention. Saw it a few days ago, here:
http://jezebel.com/5661155/flowchart-know-your-stereotypical-female-characters

My argument, though, is that every character can probably fit this flowchart and that since there's a LOT of possible "stereotypes" we're still a lot better off than we were a while back. Every new character is in essence creating a new stereotype they can stick in there, somewhere. (On a personal note I don't think Uhura is a very good choice for 'useless,' though. Her role wasn't well explained in the original show, but if you think about it, working with a probably often programming on the fly with the Universal Translator must be difficult and at least slightly important.)

Date: 2010-10-15 11:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tibicina.livejournal.com
*nods* Well, and if you actually read her commentary on it rather than just the flow chart, she states that a number of those stereotypes are fairly positive, really. Likewise, she states that stereotypes and roles are the backbone of most fiction and there are a lot of good characters which still can get classed into one of those roles. It was more about 'If you have no female characters who end up in the strong original character category, then perhaps you should think about that' than 'OMG! These are all bad characters and how could anyone write them!'

I've really been trying to figure out how and why people misinterpreted that flow chart quite so badly.

Date: 2010-10-16 02:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slarti.livejournal.com
I think it's mainly because the flowchart is set up such that however good or bad any of the stereotypes are, if you arrive at any of those endpoints, you have by definition given The Wrong Answers to the initial extra super vague questions that led to the result of Strong Female Character, and that therefore all of the examples used for those stereotype endpoints must not be Strong Female Characters (in the flowchart maker's opinion, at least).

That may not have been the chart maker's intention, but the logic of the flowchart as presented makes that a pretty easy conclusion to make.

Date: 2010-10-16 01:48 pm (UTC)
ext_45018: (how does this thing work?)
From: [identity profile] oloriel.livejournal.com
Exactly.

Date: 2010-10-19 02:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] milkshake-b.livejournal.com
Thank you for articulating this so well--I've been trying to do so myself for days and failing. And I'm not so sure about the maker's intentions; I have seen some profoundly misogynistic stuff come out of Jezebel before.

Date: 2010-10-19 12:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cameoflage.livejournal.com
IAWTC.

*would like to agree more eloquently but doesn't really have anything to add*

Also, some of the non-Strong Female Character endpoints have some pretty fuzzy logic connecting the answers to the conclusion, but that pales in comparison.

Date: 2010-10-19 12:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cameoflage.livejournal.com
I'm a troper. Fitting any kind of characters into archetypes doesn't bug me unless you try to say that that's all that they are (and the flowchart is pretty ambiguous in this area), or the category you're putting them in is both inaccurate and inherently bad.

This comment has fairly little to do with the specific example of the flowchart; I just wanted to get that in.

Profile

camwyn: Me in a bomber jacket and jeans standing next to a green two-man North Andover Flight Academy helicopter. (Default)
camwyn

February 2026

S M T W T F S
12345 67
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 10th, 2026 06:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios