Another piece.
Sep. 28th, 2017 03:21 pmI had instructions for a very simple and classy-looking wire bracelet that was supposed to involve two segments interlocked with each other in something vaguely resembling a Celtic knot. I am not sure what wrist was involved in testing the original, but if you take two five-inch pieces of wire and bend them so that there is a teardrop-shaped section in the middle of each one and two close-to-touching parallel wires leading away, then interlock the teardrop sections, you wind up with something really really small. As in, if I had carried through with the directions, this bracelet would have been at least half jump rings and clasp rather than actual bracelet band.
So I said you know what, screw it, I'm going to bend this SOB and see if I can attach shiny bits to it.

I may eventually try to do the bracelet again but ignore more or less everything about the measurements in the instructions and just follow the techniques.
So I said you know what, screw it, I'm going to bend this SOB and see if I can attach shiny bits to it.

I may eventually try to do the bracelet again but ignore more or less everything about the measurements in the instructions and just follow the techniques.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-29 12:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-09-29 01:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-09-29 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-09-29 04:00 pm (UTC)When I had them set up like that it meant that the wires were curved around no more than half the diameter of my forearm, and I am not a large-forearmed person. Seriously, it would've been 'here is a small segment of interlinked basket-woven wire, and everything else is jump rings'.
Not what I was after.
no subject
Date: 2017-10-01 11:03 pm (UTC)