Date: 2005-07-23 07:38 pm (UTC)
The smoking-optional planes? Once you made it a "smoking-optional" plane, it would never, ever be useful for a "non-smoking" plane ever again.

Febreeze just doesn't get rid of that scent.

Meaning, the companies would need to keep two separate fleets of planes. Just to allow those people (a minority of the population, mind you, and not a minority through culture or genetics, but only through choice) who are addicted to a form of suicide to pollute their lungs (and those of the people around them) while on a plane flight.

I can see why the companies chose a more financially sound option.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

camwyn: Me in a bomber jacket and jeans standing next to a green two-man North Andover Flight Academy helicopter. (Default)
camwyn

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 11:32 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios