![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Jan. 8th, 2003 11:29 amConsidering buying the April issue of Playgirl. The entertainment section of my local paper indicated that there would be an article about celebrity chefs, most of whom would be disrobing for the article. The way it was phrased indicated that there would be strategic concealments for a number of the chefs and for some reason the idea of seeing someone trying to look utterly nonchalant while wielding ... I dunno, a very large balloon whisk ... in a fashion which neither God nor the French intended is amusing to me.
Yet again, I freely admit: I'm (probably) buying the magazine for the pictures. Granted, the last time I said that I was talking about GQ since drawing men's clothes is a bit hard without pictures of men for reference, but still.
Wonder if Borders carries Playgirl. I've never looked at their selection of Nekkid People Magazines, unless you count the row with Maxim and FHM and their laddish ilk, which is positioned directly above the entertainment-in-general row.
Yet again, I freely admit: I'm (probably) buying the magazine for the pictures. Granted, the last time I said that I was talking about GQ since drawing men's clothes is a bit hard without pictures of men for reference, but still.
Wonder if Borders carries Playgirl. I've never looked at their selection of Nekkid People Magazines, unless you count the row with Maxim and FHM and their laddish ilk, which is positioned directly above the entertainment-in-general row.
